Cluj-Napoca - aeronave in zbor

Salut si multumesc pentru aprecieri !

pentru pozele de contrail folosesc un Body Canon EOS 40d combinat cu un telescop Dobson de 12 inch echivalentul a 1200mm F4.7

In functie de perioada zilei in care fac pozele expunerea e e 1/1200 ziua si 1/400 -600 spre apus.

E destul de complicata toata povestea asta cu telescop + camera foto de aceea vreau sa fac un tutorial care sa-l pun pe forum in scurt timp.

Pozele astea sutn facute ieri (20 apr) de pe varful caraiman cu obiectiv foto de 400 mm +TC1.4X

doar doua avioane au trecut cat am fost pe varf. Sunt usor grabit catre munca , si de aia nu scriu info despre aeronave, dar se cam subantelege ce-i in poze. Cel mai important e cat de clare ies de pe varf de munte.

RATus a scris:

E destul de complicata toata povestea asta cu telescop + camera foto de aceea vreau sa fac un tutorial care sa-l pun pe forum in scurt timp.

Eu unul astept cu mare curiozitate tutorial`ul. Intrebare: se poate aplica acelasi procedeu si in cazul unui binoclu? Binoclu+aparat foto?

airbusA380 a scris:

RATus a scris:

E destul de complicata toata povestea asta cu telescop + camera foto de aceea vreau sa fac un tutorial care sa-l pun pe forum in scurt timp.

Eu unul astept cu mare curiozitate tutorial`ul. Intrebare: se poate aplica acelasi procedeu si in cazul unui binoclu? Binoclu+aparat foto?

si eu astept cu mare nerabdare ......poate reusesc sa adaptez ceva la aparatul meu....

Cu binoclu sau orice alt aparat optic + aparat foto cel mai important e sa cumperi sau sa-ti creezi cumva un dispozitiv de legatura care sa tina lentila binoclului, lunetei etc cu obiectivul aparatului, iar lpovestea cu telescopul din pacate trebuie sa astepte vreo saptamana pana o sa o postez cu poze si sfaturi si tototot. Pana atunci va pun ceva poze facute cu obiectivul de 400 mm... nu la calitate de telescop dar totusi ok.

Pozele sunt facute pe Cj in jur de ora 15. Am sa va rog sa le dibuiti voi ca eu sunt usor agitat acuma in pregatire de o excursie si la cateva sunt confuz si nu vreau sa scriu prostii .

Un Wizz prin zona casei mele proaspat decolat :


Ceva mai mic pe cerul Clujului



Un 747 la joasa altitudine


Necunoscut mie si amaratului meu de 12X Zoom:


AtlasJet dar fata de pozele postate de RATus cateva zile mai devreme are "burtica" rosie (parca tot 757 dar nu sunt deloc sigur):


Tot Atlas:


Jetran Air Pasarea care la 5 minute dupa ce a trecut de casa mea inca se mai auzea ragnind si facand "cladirile





Si un Tarom care din motive doar de el stiute a trecut pe deasupra curtii mele si asta in timp ce eu upload-am pozele proaspat facute :





Interesant ii cat de repede a virat dreapta acel AtlasJet fata de Wizz, Jetran si Tarom

L.E. de fapt AtlasJet este A320 si nu 757

Cel mic de pe cerul Clujului e un MD-80, iar al 2 lea e un A330.

gabi-737 a scris:

Cel mic de pe cerul Clujului e un MD-80, iar al 2 lea e un A330.

Mi s-a parut mult mai mic ceva gen CRJ dar dat fiind faptul ca nu sunt un extraordinar spotter cred pe toti care sunt mai convingatori ca mine cat despre al doilea sunt ferm pe pozitie desi eu cred ca al treilea ii A330

O mica observatie am, la 747 de care zicea-i ca e la altitudine joasa, de fapt era la altitudinea de croaziera a lui, nu era jos deloc, dar fiind asa mare de 70m lungime pare mai jos fata de un MD80 de 45m, desi zboara cam la FL330-360.

Tot asa credeam si eu la inceput

Si totusi de ce nu lasa contrail 747`le? Sau depinde si de conditiile atmosferice: sa fie la altitudinea de croaziera si totusi sa nu lase contrail?

am facut acuma 2 poze pe cer.. urmeaza si altele daca pleaca norul mare de deasupra mea

airbusA380 a scris:

Si totusi de ce nu lasa contrail 747`le? Sau depinde si de conditiile atmosferice: sa fie la altitudinea de croaziera si totusi sa nu lase contrail?

Absolut era mai jos , mai trecuse mai devreme un 747 prin zona casei mele si era mult mai sus ( nu am putut sa i faca pozne din cauza norilor.

Sunt cu telescopul sau doar cu 400 si extensie?

Primul avion este un Airbus A330-300 de la China
Si al2lea un 757-300

la al doilea am dubii din cauza la winglette, cred ca e a321

uite inca 2 poze:





( sunt facute cu telescopul dar am de lucru la calibrat.. )

Posibil sa fie Aibus pt ca e la fel cu botul rotund, nu am obs wingle.

Poza 2 care ai postat-o acum e un 737-800 Air Berlin, prima nush seamana pe Fokker F-28 dar nu ma pronunt

Io zic ca-i Fokker 70 de la Austrian Arrows

Si doar pt ca Austrian Arrows nu au F28, e intradevar F70

si un MD-11 de la World Airways

Asta e pozat cu 100-400 mm

Air Berlin este B738.Foaret misto pozele.

am fost azi la aeroport si am scos si telescopul, dar nu stiu cand termin de preolucrat pozele. Dar pun totusi un mic preview



place?

Foarte tare, more please

Oh da foarte mandra poza mai vrem. Este un Boeing 777-300ER De la Emirates.

Intre timp am vazut poza ta de sus cu Air China si curiozitatea m-a facut sa dau pe net sa vad ce avion e mai exact gues what?

Citat :

Two passengers on a China Airlines flight from Vietnam to Taiwan attacked the flight attendants yesterday, forcing the plane to divert from its original destination of Taipei and land at Kaohsiung International Airport.
Amid media speculations that the flight had been hijacked, it was confirmed that the incident was caused by two passengers who had drunk too much wine.
The two passengers, a Vietnamese-American couple, were detained by Kaohsiung authorities after Flight C1682 landed around 3 p.m. yesterday afternoon. The plane, which departed from Ho Chi Minh City, then proceeded on to Taipei.
The remaining 214 passengers and 14 crew members arrived safely at Chiang Kai-Shek International Airport 5:51 p.m. yesterday evening, after having been delayed for nearly three hours.
The 43-year-old man, Danh Quinh Suot, who showed tendencies of manic-depressive disorder, broke the inner windowpane in the plane's cabin with his elbow after a few glasses of wine, said airport police officers at Kaohsiung International Airport.
A drunken lunge
The noise caused a commotion on the plane, and two Taiwanese attendants who were fluent in Vietnamese tried to calm him down. However, he took a swing at one of the attendants, startling neighboring passengers.
A male flight attendant was summoned to restrain the heavily built man, while the pilots asked for permission to make an emergency landing at Kaohsiung International Airport, claiming that the plane had been hijacked.
The scuffle between the man and the flight attendants was caught on videotape by one of the passengers on the plane. Later, the man's wife presented his medical records and prescriptions to the authorities, during questioning. The authorities then concluded that the incident was just an aviation safety violation rather than a hijacking attempt.
The couple was reportedly escorted to a nearby hospital for relevant treatment.
Authorities said that the case will be turned over to the Kaohsiung District Prosecutors Office, as instructed by the Civil Aeronautics Administration. They further said that the man's actions had violated the Civil Aviation Law on aviation safety, and that he could face a seven-year prison sentence or an NT$210,000 fine.

Sursa

Citat :

Air rage' incident diverts CAL plane
By Shelley Shan
STAFF REPORTER, WITH AP
Thursday, Jul 20, 2006, Page 1

A China Airlines flight from Ho Chi Minh City to the US via Taipei was forced to land at Kaohsiung International Airport yesterday after a reportedly drunken passenger broke a window and attacked flight attendants.

In a statement, China Airlines said a Vietnamese-American man identified as Danh Quinh Suot, 32, assaulted attendants and broke a window next to a seat with his elbow, prompting the plane's captain to request that the flight be diverted for safety reasons.

According to Lee Chung-rong (李仲榮), deputy director of the Civil Aeronautics Administration, the captain sent out a distress signal indicating a hijack.

The procedure, Lee said, was appropriate for the occasion.

Danh was drunk, the airline said, adding that no other passengers were injured in the incident.

Upon the Airbus 330's arrival in Kaohiung, both Danh and his wife were taken off the plane by aviation police for questioning.

Danh was arrested for allegedly threatening aviation safety.

Aviation police at Kaohsiung airport said that they found medication used to treat mental illness among Danh's belongings while they were questioning him.

Police later took him to a local hospital for medical and psychological examinations. Danh was accompanied by representatives from the American Institute in Taiwan, Kaohsiung Office.

The initial investigation by police found that Dahn was mentally unstable when he broke an inside window pane.

They turned over the case to the Kaohsiung District Prosecutors Office for further investigation.

Meanwhile, the China Airlines plane, flight 682, spent about two hours on the ground in Kaohsiung before continuing on to Taipei. It took off from Kaohisung around 5pm and arrived at the CKS International Airport at 5:51pm. The flight was supposed to have arrived at 3:15pm.

Family members of passengers were anxious and upset about the delay and complained that China Airlines had not immediately informed them about the incident and the diversion to Kaohsiung.

CAL spokesman Johnson Sun (孫鴻文) said the company regretted the inconvenience caused to the flight's passengers as well as the personnel in the Kaohsiung airport.

Sun emphasized that yesterday's diversion had been a flight safety issue.

"The average window is double-layered, so safety will not be threatened,'' he said.

He said passengers were not allowed to board flights if they were determined to be intoxicated or if they were mentally unstable, but airlines cannot stop someone from boarding if they do not show outward signs of impairment.

Fang Yueh-chiang (方粵強), director of incident investigation for the Aviation Safety Council, said the council would not investigate the incident.

"This was a case of an unruly passenger in the cabin," Fang said, "His behavior did not lead to a plane crash, so there is no need for us to investigate."

According to the Civil Aviation Act (民用航空法), passengers found guilty of affecting flight safety through violent measures or damaging a plane's facilities could face up to seven years in prison.

Sursa

La avionul asta ma refer mai exact

RATus a scris:

https://i.servimg.com/u/f45/11/85/02/18/img_6311.jpg

Hop si restu de poze

Acelasi 777-300 de mai sus


nu sunt sigur 100% dar cred ca e US airways a320


tot us airways 767


tot el


Iran Air a300


Alt 777 de la Emirates


si inca un iran air.. (mda.. nu prea mare diversitatea azi )


Thomson Fly 737


777-200 emirates




737 sky airlines


Cred ca e Lufthansa a340-300

Super misto pozele Mr. Ratus!!!! Very nice!!!!

Ca de obicei ,frumoase poze.737-le de la sky airlines mi se pare foarte misto.